-
Last updated on
The COP30 will take place in Belém, Brazil, a city located in the Amazon forest. © Shutterstock
The climate summit in Belém (November 2025, Brazil) will, among other things, focus on revised national climate plans, adaptation, and a roadmap towards 1.3 trillion dollars in climate financing. The Brazilian presidency is highly motivated, despite the fierce anti-climate policies of the United States. Once again, we turned to our colleague Ulrik Lenaerts – deputy head of the Belgian climate delegation – for further insight.
Key messages
- The inauguration of American President Trump led to an aggressive anti-climate policy in the United States.
- Nevertheless, its impact on other countries appears to be rather limited. The atmosphere at the UN climate negotiations remains constructive.
- The Brazilian presidency aims to turn COP30 in Belém into the COP of truth. It is approaching the organisation with great thoroughness, under the slogan Global Mutirão: collective efforts.
- The key items on the agenda are: (1) the submission of revised national climate plans, (2) adaptation, (3) closing the climate finance gap, and (4) ensuring a just transition.
- Furthermore, Brazil is focusing on tropical forests with a Tropical Forest Forever Facility.
- Belgium will be represented by a 31-member delegation, including two ministers.
Today – 3 October 2025 – we once again are on the eve of a major UN climate summit: COP30, which will take place in Belém (Brazil) from 10 to 21 November. Since the last climate summit in Azerbaijan, climate disruption continues to manifest in various ways. Focusing on Europe alone: extreme heat in both Greece and Finland, wildfires that have destroyed 10,000 km² of forest within the EU (one third the size of Belgium), melting Alpine glaciers, drought in Belgium… The total economic damage from the summer of 2025 in Europe is estimated at 43 billion euros.
Trump administration
In the meantime, climate negotiators from nearly every country continued to work tirelessly. The inauguration of American President Trump in January 2025, however, proved to be a disruptive element. His second term marked a radical shift in American climate policy. The United States not only withdrew from the Paris Climate Agreement, but the Trump administration also dismissed all climate officials and researchers. A particularly telling move was the shutdown of the world’s most authoritative CO₂ monitoring station in Hawaii.
Still, there is no sign of a domino effect, assures our colleague Ulrik Lenaerts – the deputy head of the Belgian climate delegation. “So far, no other country has pulled out of the climate agreement. What we are seeing is that countries are slower to announce their new climate targets and more cautious in their ambitions. And many countries are uniting in their indignation over the fact that the world’s largest economy is no longer willing to make any effort.”
The COP of truth
Brazil takes its presidency very seriously. “The South American country is determined to prove that multilateralism (seeking solutions to global challenges through international dialogue, ed.) and the Paris Agreement are still functioning,” says Lenaerts.
“Brazilian president Lula da Silva also feels bolstered by the recent climate summit held during the UN General Assembly in New York, convened by Secretary-General António Guterres. Despite President Trump claiming in his speech that climate change was a hoax, 134 countries still attended the summit, represented at ministerial or head-of-government level. President da Silva even declared that COP30 must become the COP of truth.”
Global Mutirão
To encourage global climate action, the Brazilian presidency uses the slogan ‘Global Mutirão.’ Mutirão is a word from the Indigenous Tupi-Guarani language meaning ‘collective efforts’: everyone contributes. Civil society and Indigenous peoples are also being involved. “It’s meant to be a dynamic process, and many veterans from previous COPs have been brought on board,” says Lenaerts. “Think of former COP presidents like Laurent Fabius from COP15 in Paris but also finance ministers.”
This dynamic will be reflected in (1) bringing together heads of government, (2) the actual intergovernmental negotiations, (3) a clear action agenda, and (4) engaging the public.
One possible downside to Brazil’s presidency was perhaps its decision to hold the summit in Belém—right in the heart of the Amazon rainforest. “But I understand the logic,” says Lenaerts. “Brazil wanted to draw attention to the Amazon and hold the summit in a disadvantaged region. The only issue was the lack of infrastructure to accommodate all the participants. Still, it will work out in the end, with a smaller-sized summit.”
Due to climate disruption, tropical forests are gradually storing less carbon. That is why the Brazilian presidency of the COP30 focuses on tropical forests. Picture: a piece of untouched Amazon forest. © Shutterstock
Green Deal
The EU has always played a pioneering role, but recently we have been hearing more and more reports suggesting it may be seriously scaling back its ambitious Green Deal. Lenaerts explains: “We remain committed to the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040. However, the European Commission believes that European industry must be able to remain sufficiently competitive. To that end, it has developed the Clean Industrial Deal, which helps companies reduce their CO₂ emissions.”
“For example, it also aims to counter unfair competition from non-EU countries through CBAM (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism). This is essentially a carbon tax on products imported from outside the EU, such as iron, fertilizer and cement, designed to offset their CO₂ emissions. The lower the emissions, the lower the tax.”
“Furthermore, the Commission wants to be more flexible. For instance, 3% of the required 35% reduction – needed to move from a 55% reduction in 2030 to a 90% reduction in 2040 – may be achieved through carbon credits outside the EU.”
The new climate targets to be submitted in Belém must apply to 2035. Lenaerts: “So the EU still needs to set an interim target. It has already indicated that this will likely fall between 66% and 72% and should put the EU on track for climate neutrality by 2050, although no agreement has been reached yet. The current Danish EU presidency will present this to the heads of government at the EU summit on 23 and 24 October 2025. A special Environment Council on 4 November will make a final decision. In principle, the revised EU climate plans could be finalised just in time for COP30.”
Decision of the Council of EU Environment Ministers
On 5 November 2025, the Council of EU Environment Ministers decided to stick to the 90% reduction target by 2040. However, it will be possible to achieve 5% of the necessary reduction - instead of the 3% proposed by the European Commission - through high-quality carbon credits realized outside the EU. Domestic permanent carbon removals are also taken into account more.
The compromise also builds in more flexibility within and between sectors and instruments. For example, member states can compensate for deficits in one sector with surpluses from other sectors. Finally, a review clause allows for better monitoring of the impact on competitiveness and purchasing power.
Energy transition out of balance
The COP28 in Dubai decided, among other things, to triple the share of renewable energy by 2030 and to move away significantly from fossil fuels. And indeed, the production of solar and wind energy is on the rise. Yet, at the same time, many countries continue to invest in oil and gas extraction. How can that be reconciled?
Lenaerts outlines the situation: “The transition to renewable energy is still far from balanced. While renewable energy capacity is on track and is the fastest-growing energy source globally, energy storage – like battery parks – and transmission – such as high-voltage lines and offshore wind connections – are lagging behind. So, storage and transmission are not keeping pace with the rapid increase in electrification. That is why countries like China and India are still turning to additional fossil fuel-based capacity to keep the system balanced. After all, the demand for energy and electricity continues to rise sharply. Only once we hit a ceiling there will the share of fossil fuels drop significantly. Moreover, we are also behind schedule in terms of higher energy efficiency – energy-efficient housing and production processes.”
1.5°C target remains
Reportedly, we have only three years of carbon budget left to stay within the 1.5°C warming limit. Nevertheless, the EU and the world continue to uphold that goal. Lenaerts: “Going beyond 1.5°C would involve unreasonable risks. That is why we must fight for every fraction of a degree. Of course, this will require very sharp emission reductions, but we remain committed.”
The Belgian delegation, with 31 members, is slightly smaller than usual. Still, NGOs, scientists, and businesses will once again be represented. Two ministers are also travelling to Belém: federal Minister for Climate, Crucke, and Walloon Minister for Energy and the Air-Climate Plan, Neven.
What is on the agenda?
1. Revised national climate plans
Countries are expected to submit their revised – and more ambitious – nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Those are new plans to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by 2035. The Paris Agreement stipulates that these plans must be reviewed every five years.
So far, only 30 countries have submitted their new plans, but many more are expected to follow. The EU, for its part, has also experienced delays (see text). Based on the submitted plans, calculations will be made to determine the level of global warming we are heading towards. Staying within the 1.5°C limit is clearly out of reach, but Brazil wants to explore – based on reports from the international climate panel IPCC – what it would take to still reach the 1.5°C target.
2. Adaptation
The decisions made at COP28 in Dubai regarding adaptation – adjusting to the consequences of climate disruption – require further elaboration. This includes thematic objectives: how we will adapt ecosystems, water supply, food security, biodiversity, health, infrastructure, social equality, and poverty reduction. To measure progress on all these objectives, COP30 aims to develop a maximum of 100 indicators.
Adaptation is a major priority for southern countries. However, they do not want to be held accountable if they fail to meet the objectives, as they have limited control over the impact of their adaptation measures and often lack sufficient financial resources. Many are therefore calling for an indicator on funding: to what extent is climate finance being made available? Wealthy countries, on the other hand, are somewhat reluctant to engage in discussions on adaptation financing. They already agreed last year to provide 300 billion dollars in climate finance by 2035 and do not wish to reopen this debate.
3. Bridging the climate finance gap
At COP29, donor countries promised to provide at least 300 billion dollars in climate finance by 2035, drawing from various sources: public funds, multilateral development banks, mobilised private finance, and more. However, the actual need amounts to 1.3 trillion dollars. COP30 will explore how this gap can be bridged.
Ideas already exist, of course, such as innovative financing. France, for example, proposes a global solidarity levy, potentially on international transport. It will also be crucial to create capital markets in southern countries to attract investment. Yet companies tend to be quite risk-averse when it comes to investing there. We need to find a solution for that.
Furthermore, ecosystems should be developed that encourage companies to invest in renewable energy rather than fossil fuels. The EU believes we should exchange experiences — best practices — on what works and what doesn’t.
Domestic resources — taxes and such — will also be an important part of the financing package. But for Arab and some African countries, this remains a sensitive issue.
4. Just transition
The transition towards a low-carbon society – based, among other things, on renewable energy – inevitably involves the phasing out of sectors that heavily rely on fossil fuels. To ensure this transition is fair, people who lose their jobs must be adequately supported.
There is a clash of two opposing views on this topic.
The West mainly sees it as a domestic issue that can be addressed by diversifying the economy and providing social safety nets. Sharing information on how different countries tackle this is also very useful. Trade unions and civil society emphasise the importance of quality jobs and opportunities for participation.
The South mainly sees it as a North-South issue. They believe they lack sufficient resources for the transition due to investment risk aversion. They also view measures like CBAM – a carbon tax, see text – as a trade barrier they do not agree with. For instance, CBAM would raise the cost of importing electric vehicles, batteries, and steel from China.
Just transition – including its trade dimension – is a hot topic. Brazil is expected to engage in a vigorous debate on this matter.
5. Global Stocktake
The Global Stocktake – which was central to COP28 in Dubai – is a review of how far the world has come in its efforts to tackle climate disruption. In other words, it lays bare our shortcomings.
The EU calls for robust follow-up on the adjustments needed to get back on track. Other countries, however, are dragging their heels and pointing to the need for funding.
6. Tropical forests
Brazil wants to place strong emphasis on the role of ecosystems, particularly tropical forests. In the margin of the General Assembly in New York, the Amazonian country launched the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF), a fund supported by both public (20%) and private (80%) resources. Its aim is to support countries that protect their forests. This includes the Amazon, the Atlantic rainforest, and the Congo and Mekong basins. Belgium wants to claim a significant position for the Congolese forests.
What is original about the TFFF is that it looks at a country’s performance. Satellites are used to establish a benchmark after which forest cover is monitored. Only if forest cover remains stable, increases, or declines only slightly, does the country in question qualify for financial support.
7. Synergy with other conventions
Brazil aims for maximum synergy with other UN conventions on biodiversity and desertification. Measures from the various conventions can reinforce each other, such as the protection of tropical forests.
8. Action agenda items
Each COP traditionally has many action agenda items: side issues that stakeholders want to highlight. These include the phasing out of fossil fuels, climate and health, tripling renewable energy, and so on.
The Brazilian presidency wants to curb the proliferation of action items. It counted a staggering 300 or so items, of which roughly 100 were actually active. These 100 have been grouped into six clusters: (1) energy and transport, (2) biodiversity, oceans and forests, (3) agriculture and food security, (4) resilience and cities, (5) social development, and (6) the overarching enabling factors.
Within these six clusters, Brazil identified 30 objectives: land restoration, sustainable agriculture, low-carbon technologies, transition away from fossil fuels, and so on. For each of these objectives, it plans to bring all relevant actors together during the COP to develop concrete solutions. It also appointed seven foreign and 22 Brazilian Special Envoys to make the discussions more effective.
More on Planet
UN Plastics Treaty: looking ahead to the next attempt
The renewed attempt to secure a legally binding UN Plastics Treaty (Geneva, 5–14 August 2025) was unsuccessful, but there are gl...
SOFF: better global weather forecasting
Our FPS is supporting the UN-led SOFF initiative, which aims to close the gaps that exist in weather observations worldwide. Sin...
UN Ocean Conference: Belgium emerging as an ocean nation
The UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, marked an important step towards the entry into force of the BBNJ Agreement on Marine B...